Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in research: Meta-analyses have led to misleading claims in the past

doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7483.145-b

From trainee to consultant, BMJ Group offers doctors around the world tailored information, special events, learning resources and recruitment services at every step along their career path.

... by doctors, for doctors, for patients
We are open for entries!

Online learning

BMJ Learning

High-quality CME / CPD for doctors and other healthcare professionals. BMJ Learning features hundreds of accredited, peer-reviewed learning modules in text, video, and audio formats. Find out more

Courses and Qualifications

BMJ Masterclasses

BMJ Masterclasses, led by experts, help clinicians to use the latest evidence and recent guidelines in practice and meet their CPD/CME requirements. Find out more

Exam Preparation

The leading provider of online exam preparation, helping over 167,000 healthcare professionals to pass their exams. Find out more

onExamination

Search all BMJ comment articles:

From

Limit by

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Peter J Horsey, honorary consultant anaesthetist (Horsey@lineone.net)

Ashley, Stockbridge, Hampshire SO20 6RH

EDITOR—Montori et al cite the Cochrane albumin review in the table comparing two systematic reviews of albumin for fluid resuscitation.1 2 This review is an egregious example of a review that made a misleading claim—in this case a 6% additional mortality when albumin was compared with saline in a meta-analysis.

The users' guide of …