Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in research: Discussion section helps redress the balanceBMJ 2005; 330 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7483.145-a (Published 13 January 2005) Cite this as: BMJ 2005;330:145
- S Anuradha, master of public health student ([email protected])
- Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN
EDITOR—Montori et al produce a users' guide to detecting misleading claims in reports of clinical research.1 In the previous letter Penston raises objections to the proposal to read only the methods and results section and to …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial