Lifting the fog of uncertainty from the practice of medicine

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1419 (Published 16 December 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:1419

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Benjamin Djulbegovic, professor of oncology and medicine (djulbebm@moffitt.usf.edu)
  1. H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA

    Strategy revolves around evidence, decision making, and leadership

    Despite the exponential growth of medical information, the effects of healthcare interventions are often uncertain or controversial.w1 This unreliability or uncertainty of all information is what the military philosopher Clausewitz called the fog of war.1 Clausewitz maintained that the key to a rational approach to warfare was understanding the impact of chance and the laws of the probability and its interplay with the other factors in war—such as people, governments, and, in particular, the commander in the field. This approach may also benefit health care.

    Recently, McNeil argued that the major hidden barriers to better health care result from a lack of discussion of the impact of uncertainty in medicine.2 She enumerated several sources of uncertainty that cloud decision making in modern health care: uncertainty as a result of lack of convincing evidence because of delayed or obsolete data from clinical studies; uncertainty about applicability of evidence from research at the bedside; and uncertainty about interpretation of data.2 w2 Others …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL