Reviews PERSONAL VIEWS

Pitfalls on the road to drug safety

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7479.1411 (Published 09 December 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:1411
  1. Carl Schoenberger (mcschoenberger@aol.com), pulmonologist
  1. Bethesda, Maryland

    The recent withdrawal of rofecoxib (Vioxx) from the worldwide market has focused intense public scrutiny on drug safety. Although the US Food and Drug Administration monitors drug safety after product approval, some have raised concerns about whether this system, which relies primarily upon voluntary reporting of adverse drug effects, is adequate to protect the public from unsafe pharmaceuticals.

    In his televised appearance before the US Senate finance committee on 18 November, Dr David Graham, associate director in the FDA's Office of Drug Safety, claimed his own agency was “incapable of protecting [the public]” from other dangerous pharmaceuticals (BMJ 2004;329: 1253). He then listed five drugs that he considered potentially unsafe—the acne drug isotretinoin (Roaccutane), the weight loss drug sibutramine (sold as Reductil in Britain and Meridia in the United States), the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor valdecoxib (Bextra), the lipid lowering drug rosuvastatin (Crestor), and the asthma drug salmeterol (Serevent).

    I am all …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe