- Arnold Christianson, professor (arnold.christianson@nhls.ac.za),
- Allison Streetly, honorary senior lecturer (allison.streetly@kcl.ac.uk),
- Aamra Darr, senior research fellow (a.r.darr@leeds.ac.uk)
- Division of Human Genetics, National Health Laboratory Service and University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Department of Public Health Sciences, GKT School of Medicine, King's College Hospital, London SE1 3QD
- Centre for Research in Primary Care, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9LP
Most of the recent advances in medical genetics have been in basic science and technology. Experience of translating these into effective, population based interventions is limited, but the potential is great, especially for lower resource countries.1 2 This is well illustrated by the experience of the national thalassaemia screening programme in Iran (p 1134), a comprehensive, primary care based programme for screening and genetic counselling. Since the programme's inception in 1996 premarital screening of 2.7 million couples has been carried out over five years, followed by genetic counselling of more than 10 000 couples who were found to be positive. This has resulted in a 70% reduction in the expected annual birth rate of affected infants.3 For a vast, lower-resource country with a population of 68 million, this is a considerable achievement.
As low and middle income countries undergo demographic and epidemiological transition and infant mortality falls below 50/1000 live births, congenital disorders become increasingly visible and costly, contributing up to 30% of infant mortality in countries in the eastern Mediterranean region. Sickle cell disease and thalassaemia are a natural “point of entry” to genetics services for many such countries.2 The thalassaemias are prevalent in the countries of the eastern Mediterranean region, South Asia, and South East Asia (figure). Thalassaemia major results in profound anaemia and death in infancy …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012