This article has a correction
Please see: Safety of antipsychotic drugs for pregnant and breastfeeding women with non-affective psychosis
- Louise Howard (l.howard@iop.kcl.ac.uk), senior lecturer,
- Roger Webb (r.webb@man.ac.uk), research fellow,
- Kathryn Abel (kathryn.m.abel@man.ac.uk), senior lecturer
- Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF
- Centre for Women's Mental Health Research, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL
Around 2% of women develop a non-affective psychotic disorder, and more than half of them have children.1 2 Women with nonaffective psychoses are less fertile than controls, partly because of hyperprolactinaemia secondary to antipsychotic drugs.3 4 The use of atypical drugs such as clozapine and olanzapine, which do not have this effect, may increase fertility rates. Weighing risks against benefits in treating pregnant and breastfeeding women with antipsychotics requires assessment of clinical effectiveness versus risk of toxicity to mother, fetus, newborn, and the developing child. Withholding antipsychotic treatment may expose mother and fetus to more harm than benefit as, in addition to behavioural disturbance which may put both at risk, physiological changes associated with psychosis could affect fetoplacental integrity and development of the central nervous system. Subsequently, poor clinical outcomes for mothers may result in poorer interaction between mother and infant.5 But the impact of antipsychotic medication on the fetus is also unclear as no randomised controlled trials have evaluated the use of antipsychotics in pregnancy.6
The only large controlled studies of antipsychotics in pregnancy have been conducted on …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012