This article has a correction
Please see: Safety of antipsychotic drugs for pregnant and breastfeeding women with non-affective psychosis
- Louise Howard (l.howard@iop.kcl.ac.uk), senior lecturer,
- Roger Webb (r.webb@man.ac.uk), research fellow,
- Kathryn Abel (kathryn.m.abel@man.ac.uk), senior lecturer
- Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF
- Centre for Women's Mental Health Research, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL
Around 2% of women develop a non-affective psychotic disorder, and more than half of them have children.1 2 Women with nonaffective psychoses are less fertile than controls, partly because of hyperprolactinaemia secondary to antipsychotic drugs.3 4 The use of atypical drugs such as clozapine and olanzapine, which do not have this effect, may increase fertility rates. Weighing risks against benefits in treating pregnant and breastfeeding women with antipsychotics requires assessment of clinical effectiveness versus risk of toxicity to mother, fetus, newborn, and the developing child. Withholding antipsychotic treatment may expose mother and fetus to more harm than benefit as, in addition to behavioural disturbance which may put both at risk, physiological changes associated with psychosis could affect fetoplacental integrity and development of the central nervous system. Subsequently, poor clinical outcomes for mothers may result in poorer interaction between mother and infant.5 But the impact of antipsychotic medication on the fetus is also unclear as no randomised controlled trials have evaluated the use of antipsychotics in pregnancy.6
The only large controlled studies of antipsychotics in pregnancy have been conducted on …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27