Quality Improvement Reports

Introduction of nurse led DC cardioversion service in day surgery unit: prospective audit

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7471.892 (Published 14 October 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:892
  1. M P Currie, consultant nurse (mary.currie{at}bromleyhospitals.nhs.uk)1,
  2. S P Karwatowski, consultant cardiologist1,
  3. J Perera, associate specialist anaesthetist2,
  4. E J Langford, consultant cardiologist1
  1. 1 Department of Cardiology, Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust, Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent BR6 8ND
  2. 2 Department of Anaesthetics, Day Surgery Unit, Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust
  1. Correspondence to: M P Currie
  • Accepted 27 July 2004

Abstract

Problem Atrial fibrillation is the most common persistent arrhythmia in adults and carries an increased risk of thromboembolism and stroke. Electrical (DC) cardioversion is an effective treatment, but logistical difficulties in many institutions lead to problems providing a prompt service. This reduces the rate of long term success, delays relief of symptoms, and increases the burden on anticoagulation clinics.

Design Prospective audit of introduction of a collaborative, nurse led DC cardioversion service in a day surgery unit.

Setting Day surgery unit 5 km from an acute hospital in southeast London.

Key measures for improvement Waiting times, success of procedures, and complication rates.

Strategies for change Collaborative working across traditional specialty boundaries; empowerment of patients within the process; using a nurse consultant as a single point of reference to coordinate the service.

Effects of change Sinus rhythm was restored in 131 (92%) of the first 143 patients treated. Three patients needed hospital admission; all were discharged uneventfully within 24 hours. No important complications occurred. Waiting times were reduced from 27 weeks to eight weeks for patients eligible for the service.

Lessons learnt Elective DC cardioversion under general anaesthesia can be safely done by an appropriately trained nurse in a day surgery unit remote from an acute general hospital. This model of care is effective and can reduce waiting times and relieve pressure on acute beds and junior doctors.

Background

Atrial fibrillation is the most common persistent arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. The incidence of atrial fibrillation has been shown to increase from 0.1% a year in people aged under 40 years to greater than 1.5% a year in women over 80 and greater than 2% a year in men over 80.1 Atrial fibrillation is associated with a twofold increase in mortality and considerable morbidity related to heart failure, embolic events, or poor rate control. Treatment options include attempts to restore sinus rhythm by pharmacological or electrical cardioversion.2

Outline of the problem

Elective electrical cardioversion of appropriately anticoagulated patients under sedation or anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure for restorating sinus rhythm. In the NHS elective DC cardioversion is generally done by junior doctors within acute general hospitals. However, with changing patterns of work for junior medical staff, including the European Working Time Directive, doctors' time is an increasingly scarce resource. In addition, a shortage of beds leads to frequent cancellations, and the ad hoc nature of admissions prevents dedicated theatre sessions. Delays reduce the chance of success,3 increase morbidity for patients, and add workload to anticoagulant clinics.

Use of day surgery units has been shown to reduce cancellations, but this has not been reported in sites remote from an acute general hospital. The development of off-site diagnosis and treatment centres provides a source of theatre time with dedicated beds. Nurse led DC cardioversion has been suggested as a solution to the shortage of doctors' time, and limited reports have suggested that this is safe in the context of a medical ward with physician support.3 4 We report our experience of nurse led DC cardioversion in a day surgery unit without physician cover.

Details of new service

We established a new service comprising twice monthly dedicated theatre sessions within a day surgery unit serving a population of 300 000 in southeast London. For the first 23 months this was situated about 5 km from the acute hospital. Cardioversions were done by an appropriately trained nurse with certification as a provider of advanced life support and with training in interpretation of electrocardiograms.5 Further training included 20 cases supervised by consultant cardiologists to ensure that all aspects of the procedure had been considered, including how to manage adverse situations and adjust treatment after the procedure.

We accepted all patients needing DC cardioversion, with the following exclusions: left ventricular ejection fraction less than 35%, permanent pacemaker in situ, severe valve disease, symptoms of ischaemic heart disease, previous symptoms of bradycardia, and body mass index greater than 35. All patients had a minimum of four weeks' anticoagulation before cardioversion and an international normalised ratio of not less then 2.0 during that time. We sent patients an appointment six weeks in advance of their procedure. Patients were assessed during the week before cardioversion. The nurse consultant acted as a single point of reference for any queries.

On the day of their procedure patients arrived at 7 45 am. The nurse consultant obtained consent in accordance with guidance from the Department of Health6 and then carried out the procedure. The protocol initially consisted of monophasic shocks of 200 J, 360 J, and 360 J; from August 2003 we changed to biphasic shocks of 150 J then 200 J as needed. A senior associate specialist or consultant in anaesthetics provided general anaesthesia. After the cardioversion the nurse consultant reviewed patients with their electrocardiograms and made appropriate changes to drug treatments according to an agreed local protocol. A follow up appointment was arranged with the referring consultant for one month after the procedure to allow for review of rhythm and drugs.

Strategies for change

Identification and resolution of those elements of the previous system that led to cancellations and inefficiencies was essential to the success of the new service. We identified these elements as lack of availability of beds within acute wards; lack of workforce and resource planning leading to cancellations due to non-availability of rostered junior staff; inability to arrange timing of cardioversion in response to changing clinical circumstances, such as introduction of new antiarrhythmic drugs; poor coordination with anticoagulation services; failure to involve patients in the process; and poor overall coordination of the service due to the lack of an identifiable clinically aware coordinator. We introduced various solutions to these problems.

Using the day surgery unit avoided cancellations, as beds were always available. Using a nurse consultant with a dedicated session overcame previous problems with non-availability of junior staff. We faxed details of admission dates for cardioversion to the anticoagulant clinic to focus attention on ensuring effective anticoagulation in the period immediately before the procedure. The role of the nurse consultant as a single point of reference for any queries allowed solutions to be found, which also helped to reduce cancellations.

Patients had greater involvement in the process through the redesign of the appointment letter, which encouraged and empowered them to phone if their international normalised ratio was less than 2. Their procedure was then rescheduled, but in sufficient time to reallocate the slot to another patient. Patients were also provided with more information through the introduction of an information sheet, which improved their preparation for assessment and equipped them with detailed information of what to expect on the day of the procedure. Patients were assessed during the week before cardioversion to ensure suitable anticoagulant control and fitness for the procedure. Feedback from patients emphasised that this was appreciated.

Key measures for improvement

We monitored three key outcomes prospectively. These were waiting times, procedural success, and complication rates.

Effects of change

We evaluated outcomes for the first 143 patients (100 (70%) male, 43 (30%) female; mean age 69 years), accessing the new service between April 2001 and November 2003. During this period 18 (11%) patients out of 161 referred for cardioversion fulfilled exclusion criteria.

Of the 143 patients, 131 (90%) cardioverted successfully to sinus rhythm, a proportion in line with contemporary guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology, and American Heart Association for the management of atrial fibrillation, which describe expected success rates of between 79% and 94%.2

Three patients needed to be admitted to hospital. Two patients with hypotension were subsequently discharged within six hours, and one patient with sinus bradycardia was discharged the next day. No serious complications occurred.

During the period of evaluation, waiting times for elective cardioversion were reduced from 27 weeks when the service had been carried out on ad hoc basis by junior medical staff in the day surgery unit, to eight weeks for eligible patients accessing the dedicated nurse led service. Current waiting times for the 18 excluded patients, who needed inpatient beds, approach 18 months.

Lessons learnt

The re-engineering of the cardioversion service illustrates that a detailed analysis of a service and its weaknesses can identify relatively simple solutions leading to improved outcomes.

Resolving structural weaknesses

We identified structural weaknesses as non-availability of beds, theatre time, and junior doctors. We overcame these by the use of a dedicated theatre slot, dedicated anaesthetist, and dedicated nurse consultant to carry out the procedures.

Resolving process weaknesses

More subtle weaknesses related to the process. Poor coordination and communication between services involved in cardioversion led to cancellations and loss of slots. Establishment of a role for a nurse consultant to coordinate and operate the service allowed an individual member of the clinical staff to develop ownership of the service. Patients were similarly given a role in their own journey. The system previously failed to react to changing circumstances, including low international normalised ratios, changes in drug treatment, or absence of a key investigation, which led to delay and cancellation. This could be avoided in the new service by the nurse consultant liaising with the anticoagulation clinic, flexibly adjusting admission dates (placing other patients into vacated slots), and obtaining urgent investigations (for example, echocardiograms). Over time the coordinator developed relationships with the previously disparate parts of the service.

Key learning points

Logistical difficulties in many institutions lead to problems providing a prompt electrical cardioversion service, thus reducing success rates

A nurse led cardioversion service within dedicated sessions in a day surgery unit overcomes many of the logistical difficulties

This model of care is effective and can reduce waiting times and relieve pressure on acute beds and junior doctors

Conclusion

An elective DC cardioversion service can be safely operated by an appropriately trained nurse in a day surgery unit remote from an acute general hospital. This model of care is effective and can reduce waiting times and relieve pressure on acute beds and junior doctors.

Documents used to support the establishment of the service are available from the authors.

Footnotes

  • Contributors MPC designed and ran the new service, wrote the manuscript, and is the guarantor. SPK, JP, and EJL contributed to the design and running of the service and preparation of the manuscript.

  • Funding No external funding.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethical approval Not sought.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
View Abstract

Sign in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe