Screening research papers by reading abstracts: Just how rapid is “eternal” review?

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7469.801-c (Published 30 September 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:801.4

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Jonathan N Latham, president (jlatham@pharmascribe.com)
  1. PharmaScribe, Skillman, NJ 08558, USA

    EDITOR—As a freelance medical writer and editor, I am always fascinated by what catches the editor's eye and what drives decisions about whether a manuscript will be published or will perish. I thank Groves and Abbasi for confirming my suspicion that editors start the …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL