Education And Debate

Academic medicine: the evidence base

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7469.789 (Published 30 September 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:789
  1. International Working Party to Promote and Revitalise Academic Medicine ([email protected])
  1. Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina 45110, Greece
  1. Correspondence to: J P A Ioannidis

    The International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine recognises that an evidence based approach is important in discussing the problems of academic medicine. A preliminary exploration of the evidence on academic medicine has led to a research agenda for examining and proposing realistic solutions

    Introduction

    Much has been written about academic medicine and its ailments. The International Campaign to Revitalise Academic Medicine (ICRAM) immediately recognised the importance of an evidence based approach to the ongoing discussion about academic medicine.1 A task group was developed to systematically collate and evaluate the available evidence. We initially targeted major themes that were readily identifiable as being important and for which data would be reasonably straightforward to collect. The type of evidence (box 1) differed for each research question. Here we present a summary and future research agenda.

    Where are the problems?

    The Oxford English Reference Dictionary defines academe as “the world of learning,” and academic as “scholarly: to do with learning.” Scholarship is encountered as a key principle of academic medicine,w1 and it entails the discovery, integration, and application of knowledge, and teaching.w2 Academic medicine practitioners are expected to demonstrate systematic and sustained scholarly effort, with recognisable outputs valued by peers.

    Many doctors teach (for example, over 40% of UK general practitioners host medical trainees2) or participate in research sporadically, and the role of such practitioners in the academic enterprise requires more study. Patients are also increasingly involved in clinical research,3 education,4 and service5 and are important academic allies. Finally, scholarship in fields related to health care and medicine is often pursued by non-physicians (nurses or laboratory scientists, for example) who may also encounter the “triple jeopardy” of trying to excel simultaneously in teaching, research, and clinical practice.6 However, policies addressing academic medicine careers typically do not expand the definition to …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe