Letter
The evidence base for shaken baby syndrome: Competing interest declaration of the 106 authors and an editorial explanation
Cite this as:
BMJ
2004;329:741.3
- Abuse (child, partner, elder)
- Child abuse
- Competing interests (ethics)
- Ethics
- Paediatrics
- Public health
- Violence (other)
More topics 
Fewer topics
- Robert M Reece, clinical professor of paediatrics
- PO Box 523, 122 Hawk Pine Road, Norwich, VT 05055, USA rmreece1.aol.com
EDITOR—The BMJ asked my co-authors and me to complete a competing interests form only after our letter was published.1 2
Competing interest declaration: Many of the letter's authors practise, teach, lecture, consult, …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27