The necessity for improving the teaching of massage in EnglandBMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7467.682 (Published 16 September 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:682
Sir,—As massage and exercises are now recognized in England as valuable therapeutic agents, it is time that something was done to improve the training of the English masseur or masseuse. This is the only way of stopping the “invasion of England” by the Scandinavian “medical gymnast.”
The mechanical manipulations that are now taught to nurses under the name of “massage” are useless for the treatment of local affections. I have seen massage carried out in large London hospitals in a way that has been nothing but an often elegant and intricate but useless playing about on the skin. Beyond a slight stimulation of the superficial nerve endings, the effect of such a massage must be absolutely nil.
The French and the Germans have attempted to make an “art” of massage, and have invented an enormous number of complicated movements that can only appear ridiculous to an intelligent practitioner. As a handicraft, massage is very simple and can be learnt in a few days, but it is absolutely necessary that the masseur should have a knowledge of the muscles and their actions and the position of the principal blood vessels and nerves to be able to carry out instructions intelligently.
The treatment must necessarily differ according to the structure one wishes to reach. For instance, the emptying of the superficial blood vessels is effected by means of a superficial “effleurage;” a wasted muscle is kneaded or “pétrissaged” in its whole extent, and the breaking down of adhesions or muscle infiltrations is effected by means of a localized friction over the affected area. Suppose I have a patient suffering from the common affection of supraorbital neuralgia with palpable thickening of the nerve sheath, and wish to cure this by massage, how is the masseur to carry out my instructions if he does not even know the position of the nerve? For the proper giving of exercises—and without additional exercises massage is not often indicated—the knowledge of the action of the muscles is essential, as every one knows that the number of muscles implicated in any muscular action varies with the primary position of the patient. The correct giving of the exercises is of special importance in the treatment of lateral curvature.
The superiority of the Swedish masseur does not depend on the knowledge of any specially effective manipulations, but simply on the fact that he is taught the necessary anatomy and can therefore intelligently carry out one's instructions.
At the two chief gymnastic institutes in Stockholm the training extends over two years, but this includes the teaching of drill and some theoretical teaching that would be considered unnecessary in England. I believe that a year's, or even a nine-months', training would be sufficient for an intelligent person to become a useful masseur or masseuse, especially as massage has at present only a limited use in England.
If the medical profession object to this training from the fear of turning out yet another set of unqualified practitioners it will be necessary for them to self-undertake cases of local massage if they wish to obtain such good results from this treatment as is obtained on the Continent.—I am, etc.,