- Julian Sheather, ethics adviser,
- Iona Heath, general practitioner
- British Medical Association, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR
- Caversham Group Practice, London NW5 2UP
General practitioners should be allowed some discretion and humane flexibility
Doctors are familiar with ethical dilemmas. The tension of irreconcilable imperatives is a permanent feature of most of our working lives. For example, our professional ethics teach us to treat patients according to need, but in the context of a publicly funded service, resources will always be insufficient. The introduction of identity cards, dovetailing with plans to change the regulations governing eligibility for free NHS primary care, are nevertheless likely to intensify these dilemmas for general practitioners and some hospital doctors.1 2
Eligibility to free health care is quite properly a political question, to be decided by due democratic process. Crudely speaking, the NHS is a giant national risk pool—an insurance policy—and those who have not contributed, to the extent of their means and ability, should not draw on its reserves. We are properly indignant at those affluent foreigners who visit the United Kingdom because they do not wish to claim on their own private health insurance. NHS trusts also have a legal obligation to ensure that only those eligible for free care receive it. Yet the current proposals seem likely …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27