- Sarah Meredith, clinical epidemiologist (sm@ctu.mrc.ac.uk)1
- 1 MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London NW1 2DA
Wald's description of his encounter with the new research ethics committee forms provides a graphic illustration of the frustration and bemusement of most researchers when faced with the hurdles that must now be surmounted to conduct a clinical trial.1 As well as the expansion in the volume of paperwork, the need to understand and comply with the regulatory requirements for good clinical practice, reporting of adverse events, and the supply and labelling of trial drugs make it almost impossible for a clinician to undertake a clinical trial without support. This is not necessarily a bad thing if it leads to better quality studies that are safer for patients, but training and support must be funded and provided if clinical trials in the public interest are to …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Ethical considerations
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Raised inflammatory markers
Published 14 February 2012
Re: Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Published 14 February 2012
Smokefree cars in Wales: Laws are better
Published 14 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (8 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012