- Paul Little, professor of primary care research (psl3{at}soton.ac.uk)1
This study shows nicely that it may be possible to train doctors to inform mothers regarding danger signs, but that about half of mothers do not recall the information—and of those who recall the advice, many do not seem to act on it.1
Why do patients not follow doctors' advice? Several factors are likely to be operating. Advice from a health professional comes in the context of previous and subsequent experiences of illness and illness resolution, either personally or among family and friends, and these are likely to be strong modifiers of consultation behaviour.2 3 For example, parents may have experienced “danger signs” but nothing adverse happened, thus minimising the perceived threat. Furthermore, although doctors' advice is respected, lifestyle, demographic, and psychosocial factors and community support mechanisms are also likely to be important in determining consultation behaviour.2 3
Although the context is slightly different, the issues in developed and developing societies are similar: to help patients manage their own problems where appropriate, but to encourage seeking medical help where serious medical problems are more likely to arise. Several trials of providing information for parents in Western settings have shown that although patients like having information and feel more able to deal with minor illness, the effect on consultation behaviour are likely to be modest.4 5 This suggests that until more effective interventions are developed, information should probably be made available in line with patients' preferences, but should not be widely and routinely disseminated, given the attendant costs. In contrast to information provided outside the context of consultations, there is evidence that information provided to patients in a consultation—about the clinical course and self management of the presenting illness—may be helpful.6
Further research in this area could concentrate on using better established psychological models which engage with the antecedents of consultation behaviour, and identifying those patients who will selectively benefit from the provision of information.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests PL has been paid for two consultancy sessions for Abbott Pharmaceuticals regarding antibiotics for complications of respiratory tract infections.







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27