- Joseph Abbott (abbottjoseph@yahoo.com), senior house officer in ophthalmology1,
- Graham R Kirkby, consultant ophthalmologist1
- 1 Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham B18 7QH
- Correspondence to: J Abbott
- Accepted 5 March 2004
Introduction
Pituitary apoplexy is a dangerous condition, often characterised by acute onset of headache, nausea, visual field loss, and ocular paresis.1 2 The condition is primarily caused by acute swelling of a pre-existing pituitary adenoma. Postmortem surveys have found incidental pituitary adenomas with a prevalence of 5-20%.3 The incidence of symptomatic apoplexy among pituitary tumours is 2-5%.1 2 4 5 These incidences indicate that pituitary apoplexy is more common than is being diagnosed. The underlying tumour is usually found only at the time of the apoplectic episode.6 The term “pituitary apoplexy” also describes acute enlargement of a non-tumorous gland, termed “Sheehan's syndrome,” when seen in the context of obstetric haemorrhage.7
Pituitary apoplexy is initially misdiagnosed in more than three quarters of cases.4 Also, delayed diagnosis and treatment are more likely to result in permanent endocrinopathy and visual impairment.1 2 Death can result from unrecognised pituitary insufficiency or as a complication of decompression surgery. Overall deaths in recent studies varied from 0%2 5 6 to 7%.4
We present two cases of pituitary apoplexy and visual loss after major surgery. In both cases the patient had visual disturbance while recovering. These cases are diagnostically challenging because clinical features such as reduced consciousness and electrolyte abnormalities may be misinterpreted as iatrogenic postoperative complications.
Case reports
Case 1
A 48 year old man had elective aortic valve replacement under warfarin anticoagulation. Preoperative sodium was 128 mmol/l. On the day after surgery he complained that the left eye was seeing only “noise” and that the right eye …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012