This article has a correction

Please see: Getting ethics into practice

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Michael J Parker (michael.parker@ethox.ox.ac.uk), reader in medical ethics
  1. Ethox Centre, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 7LF

    Clinicians need to be able to analyse and justify their day to day value judgments

    In their day to day practice, clinicians make not only scientific judgments about the effectiveness of one intervention in comparison with another but also value judgments. Sometimes such judgments are explicit—for example, when a doctor reflects on his or her own moral views about the permissibility of abortion. In most cases, however, value judgments in medical practice are implicit in what seem, at first glance, to be “clinical” decisions.

    Thus doctors may not think of themselves as making value judgments when, for example, considering what would be in an incompetent patient's best interests, weighing up whether harm to a third party is serious enough to justify a breach of patient confidentiality, or assessing quality of life in intensive care. Yet these decisions do indeed entail the making of value judgments, as …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL