Patient choice in the NHS

BMJ 2004; 329 doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7457.61 (Published 8 July 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:61

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. John Appleby, chief economist (j.appleby@kingsfund.org.uk),
  2. Jennifer Dixon, policy director (j.dixon@kingsfund.org.uk)
  1. King's Fund, London W1G 0AN

    Having choice may not improve health outcomes

    In the run up to the next general election greater choice for patients over where to be treated is emerging as the big political idea. Ironically, while choice is being promoted in health care, there seems to be very little to choose between the two main political parties on this aspect of health policy. Last week the secretary of state for health, John Reid, announced an expansion of the Labour government's choice programme—and his Conservative opposite number, Andrew Lansley, did the same.1 2 However, look closely and some differences start to emerge. But will the power to choose really improve health outcomes for all?

    By 2008, the government says that every patient who needs to be referred by their general practitioner (such gatekeeping is to be retained) for a specialist outpatient consultation will have the choice of any NHS or private provider, or any one of the new treatment centres that are often run as public-private enterprises.3 …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL