Should reviewers of papers have their names published?: Go one step furtherBMJ 2004; 329 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7457.113-c (Published 08 July 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;329:113
- Akheel A Syed, specialist registrar ([email protected])
- University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH
EDITOR—Dimoliatis's cri de coeur for better recognition of reviewers of papers has much merit.1 Some of your respondents,2 however, are concerned that the quality of peer review could suffer as reviewers succumb to the temptation of seeing their …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial