- Siaw-Teng Liaw (t.liaw@unimelb.edu.au), professor1,
- Stephen Kerr, decision support officer2
- 1Department of Rural Health, University of Melbourne, Graham Street, Shepparton, VIC 3630, Australia
- 2National Prescribing Service, Australia, Level 7, 418A Elizabeth Street, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia
EDITOR—The deficiencies of existing computerised prescribing decision support systems in the United Kingdom described by Fernado et al and Ferner are mirrored in Australia.1 2 Focus groups conducted by the Australian national prescribing service highlighted concerns that prescribing decision support prompts may not be evidence based or comprehensive.3
Subsequently, four prescribing packages were analysed, …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27