PDF
Easy Read
Abridged PDF
Respond to this article- Versions
- bmj.38097.590810.7Cv1
- 328/7453/1410 most recent
- 1 Department of Anaesthesia, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074
- 2 Department of Obstetric Anaesthesia, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
- Correspondence to: E H C Liu
- Accepted 18 March 2004
Abstract
Objective To compare the effects of low concentration epidural infusions of bupivacaine with parenteral opioid analgesia on rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
Data sources Medline, Embase, the Cochrane controlled trials register, and handsearching of the International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia.
Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing low concentration epidural infusions with parenteral opioids.
Data synthesis Seven trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Epidural analgesia does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of caesarean section (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.48) but may be associated with an increased risk of instrumental vaginal delivery (2.11, 0.95 to 4.65). Epidural analgesia was associated with a longer second stage of labour (weighted mean difference 15.2 minutes, 2.1 to 28.2 minutes). More women randomised to receive epidural analgesia had adequate pain relief, with fewer changing to parenteral opioids than vice versa (odds ratio 0.1, 0.05 to 0.22).
Conclusions Epidural analgesia using low concentration infusions of bupivacaine is unlikely to increase the risk of caesarean section but may increase the risk of instrumental vaginal delivery. Although women receiving epidural analgesia had a longer second stage of labour, they had better pain relief.
Footnotes
-
Contributors EL conceptualised the review. EL and AS independently searched for, collated, assessed, and analysed the data, and cowrote the paper. EL will act as guarantor for the paper
-
Funding None.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Ethical approval Not required.
- Accepted 18 March 2004
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for symptomatic treatment of dementia
Published 27 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 27 May 2012
Re: Influenza vaccination in healthcare professionals
Published 27 May 2012
Greek doctors are required to deliver care all week at no cost!
Published 27 May 2012
Re: What is recall bias?
Published 27 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27