Letter

The evidence base for shaken baby syndrome

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1317 (Published 27 May 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:1317.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Authors' reply

  1. J F Geddes, retired (formerly reader in clinical neuropathology, Queen Mary, University of London) (j.f.geddes@doctors.org.uk),
  2. J Plunkett, forensic pathologist
  1. London
  2. Regina Medical Center, 1175 Nininger Road, Hastings, MN 55033, USA

    EDITOR—It is difficult to understand how Reece et al could interpret our editorial as displaying “a worrisome and persistent bias against the diagnosis of child abuse in general.” Child abuse exists, and we know and attest that it exists. The editorial does not discuss “child abuse in general.”

    Child abuse exists in many forms: our editorial addresses the diagnostic criteria for a specific type of abuse, the so-called shaken baby syndrome. We emphasise, as have Donohoe and Lantz et al,1 2 that the literature to support …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular