Reviews PERSONAL VIEW Should reviewers of papers have their names published? BMJ 2004; 328 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7450.1267 (Published 20 May 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:1267 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Letter Should reviewers of papers have their names published?: Let reviewers own responsibility for the papers they pass Published: 08 July 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7457.113-a Letter Should reviewers of papers have their names published?: Practical example gives encouraging insights Published: 08 July 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7457.113-b Letter Should reviewers of papers have their names published?: Go one step further Published: 08 July 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7457.113-c Letter Should reviewers of papers have their names published?: Reviewing is not vicarious authorship Published: 08 July 2004; BMJ 329 doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7457.113 See more Introductory Address Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 1-4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.1 Report of the Meeting of the Eastern Branch of the Provincial Association at Bury St. Edmond's Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 10-13; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.10 Mr. Warburton's Bill for the Regulation of the Medical Profession Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.13 An Atlas of Plates, illustrative of the Principles and Practice of Obstetric Medicine and Surgery, with descriptive Letterpress Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4 A Practical Treatise on the Diseases peculiar to Women, illustrated by Cases, &c Prov Med Surg J October 03, 1840, s1-1 (1) 4-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.s1-1.1.4-a
