Intended for healthcare professionals

Papers

Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1162 (Published 13 May 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:1162
  1. Ann Scheck McAlearney (mcalearney.1{at}osu.edu), assistant professor1,
  2. Sharon B Schweikhart, associate professor1,
  3. Mitchell A Medow, assistant professor of clinical medicine2
  1. 1Division of Health Services Management and Policy, Ohio State University, School of Public Health, 1583 Perry Street, Atwell 246, Columbus, OH 43210-1234, USA
  2. 2Division of General Internal Medicine, Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
  1. Correspondence to: A S McAlearney
  • Accepted 13 April 2004

Abstract

Objective To examine doctors' perspectives about their experiences with handheld computers in clinical practice.

Design Qualitative study of eight focus groups consisting of doctors with diverse training and practice patterns.

Setting Six practice settings across the United States and two additional focus group sessions held at a national meeting of general internists.

Participants 54 doctors who did or did not use handheld computers.

Results Doctors who used handheld computers in clinical practice seemed generally satisfied with them and reported diverse patterns of use. Users perceived that the devices helped them increase productivity and improve patient care. Barriers to use concerned the device itself and personal and perceptual constraints, with perceptual factors such as comfort with technology, preference for paper, and the impression that the devices are not easy to use somewhat difficult to overcome. Participants suggested that organisations can help promote handheld computers by providing advice on purchase, usage, training, and user support. Participants expressed concern about reliability and security of the device but were particularly concerned about dependency on the device and over-reliance as a substitute for clinical thinking.

Conclusions Doctors expect handheld computers to become more useful, and most seem interested in leveraging (getting the most value from) their use. Key opportunities with handheld computers included their use as a stepping stone to build doctors' comfort with other information technology and ehealth initiatives and providing point of care support that helps improve patient care.

Footnotes

  • Contributors ASMcA, SBS, and MAM were responsible for the study design, data collection, analysis, data interpretation, writing, and submission of this manuscript; they will act as guarantors for the paper. The guarantors accept full responsibility for the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. ASMcA led the writing and preparation of the manuscript for publication.

  • Funding Center for Health Management Research.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethical approval Behavioral and Social Sciences Institutional Review Board, Ohio State University (IRB protocol number 01B012).

  • Accepted 13 April 2004
View Full Text