- Aliki Taylor, Cancer Research UK training fellow in cancer public health and epidemiology (A.J.Taylor@bham.ac.uk)
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
Several studies suggest a decreased risk—except this one
This issue of the BMJ includes a study which examines the relation between pre-eclampsia and cancer.1 Many researchers have suggested that pre-eclampsia or hypertension in pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk or no excess risk of cancer in the mother.2–8 However this week's study by Paltiel et al shows an increased risk of cancer after pre-eclampsia.1
Despite decades of research, there is still confusion over the cause of pre-eclampsia. It is relatively common, affecting 3-5% of pregnancies, and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality both in the mother and unborn child.9 Several observational studies in European and North American populations have examined the relation between pre-eclampsia (or hypertension) in pregnancy and cancer.2–8 Unfortunately some were based on a small number of cancers in the pre-eclampsia group, not all adjusted for known confounders, and the length of follow up varied. Most of these studies found a …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27