- James D Shelton, senior medical scientist, office of population and reproductive health1,
- Daniel T Halperin, senior technical adviser, office of HIV/AIDS (dhalp@worldwidedialup.net)1,
- Vinand Nantulya, senior adviser2,
- Malcolm Potts, Bixby population professor3,
- Helene D Gayle, director of HIV, tuberculosis, and reproductive U4,
- King K Holmes, director5
- 1Bureau for Global Health, US Agency for International Development, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20523-3700, USA
- 2Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
- 3University of California, Berkeley 94720 USA
- 4Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA 98102, USA
- 5Center for AIDS and Sexually Transmitted Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle 98104, USA
- Correspondence to: D Halperin
- Accepted 19 January 2004
Behaviour change programmes to prevent HIV have mainly promoted condom use or abstinence, while partner reduction remains the neglected component of ABC
The key to preventing the spread of HIV, especially in epidemics driven mainly by heterosexual transmission, is through changing sexual behaviour. Interest has been growing in an “ABC” approach in which A stands for abstinence or delay of sexual activity, B for be faithful, and C for condom use (box).1 Although “be faithful” literally implies monogamy, it also includes reductions in casual sex and multiple sexual partnerships (and related issues of partner selection) that would reduce higher risk sex. While most of the often polarised discussion surrounding AIDS prevention has focused on promoting abstinence or use of condoms,w1 w2 partner reduction has been the neglected middle child of the ABC approach.
Epidemiological importance of partner reduction
It seems obvious, but there would be no global AIDS pandemic were it not for multiple sexual partnerships. The rate of change of sexual partners—especially concurrent partners—is a crucial determinant in the spread of sexually transmitted infections,w3 including HIV.2 Moreover, HIV viral load and therefore infectiousness is dramatically higher during the early (acute) stage of HIV infection,3 so transmission would be particularly heightened by partner change among newly infected people. Transmission of HIV is also facilitated by the presence of other sexually transmitted infections, especially ulcerative ones.w4 Hence, increased risk of other sexually transmitted infections from multiple partnerships further magnifies the spread of HIV.
ABC of sexual behaviour change
A = abstinence or delay of sexual activity
B = be faithful (including partner reduction and avoiding high risk partners)
C = condom use, particularly for high risk sex
Role in HIV prevention successes
Partner reduction seems to have been pivotal to success in two countries heralded for reversing their HIV epidemics, Thailand and Uganda. Thailand's “100% condom” approach in brothels is …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27