Labouring in water:Findings do not fully support conclusions

doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7442.767-c

From trainee to consultant, BMJ Group offers doctors around the world tailored information, special events, learning resources and recruitment services at every step along their career path.

... by doctors, for doctors, for patients
We are open for entries!

Online learning

BMJ Learning

High-quality CME / CPD for doctors and other healthcare professionals. BMJ Learning features hundreds of accredited, peer-reviewed learning modules in text, video, and audio formats. Find out more

Courses and Qualifications

BMJ Masterclasses

BMJ Masterclasses, led by experts, help clinicians to use the latest evidence and recent guidelines in practice and meet their CPD/CME requirements. Find out more

Exam Preparation

The leading provider of online exam preparation, helping over 167,000 healthcare professionals to pass their exams. Find out more

onExamination

Search all BMJ comment articles:

From

Limit by

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Helen Bradshaw, specialist registrar obstetrics and gynaecology (h.d.bradshaw@sheffield.ac.uk)

Rotherham General Hospital, Rotherham, South Yorkshire

EDITOR—The study by Cluett et al, comparing labour in water with standard augmentation for dystocia, tackles an important area.1 Too often modern obstetrics concentrates on major medical interventions and neglects the low tech solutions that many women would prefer.2

Despite the study's robust design the findings do not fully …