- István Turai, medical officer (Turaii@who.int)1,
- Katalin Veress, senior lecturer2,
- Bengül Günalp, associate professor3,
- Gennadi Souchkevitch, deputy director4
- 1 Department of Protection of the Human Environment, World Health Organization, Geneva 27, CH-1211, Switzerland
- 2 Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary,
- 3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gülhane Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey,
- 4 Institute of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow, Russia
- Correspondence to: I Turai
- Accepted 22 December 2003
Events that expose people to radiation are rare, but the threat of radiation injury is increasing. Doctors should know how to recognise and manage suspected exposure or contamination
Introduction
After the attacks of 11 September 2001, use of sources of radiation by terrorists with the potential to cause human damage has become a greater threat.1–4 Various professionals have discussed whether malevolent use of these sources could result in radiation sickness or radiation injuries on a large scale and the possible results.5–7 Radiation sickness is the acute or delayed consequences of exposure of the whole body or a large part to high doses of ionising radiation capable of causing a set of non-specific clinical symptoms and haematological changes. Radiation injury is the acute or delayed consequences of exposure of a small part of the body to high doses of ionising radiation capable of causing burns or other localised organ pathology—for example, cataract, hypothyreosis, and pneumonia.
Responses to recent incidents involving radiation indicate that most general practitioners are uncertain about the health consequences of exposure to ionising radiation and the medical management of exposed patients.8–10
Clinical manifestations of pathological changes depend on the size of the exposed area of the body. The severity of symptoms depends on the absorbed dose of radiation by the exposed area of the body.
The medical community needs to consider this issue because of the need for emergency medical care after a possible use of radionuclear materials by terrorists.11 12
Medical education and postgraduate training programmes for primary care doctors worldwide seem to lack the appropriate information about radiation incidents as regards recognition, differential diagnosis, and first medical response.7 13 14 We aim to advise on the basic medical management of radiation sickness and radiation injuries, and …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The word parameter is almost always wrong.
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Television shows and education about sexually transmitted infections: no laughing matter
Published 25 May 2012
Re: David Morrell
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Time to end the distinction between mental and neurological illnesses
Published 25 May 2012
Re: Are we nearly there with tranexamic acid?
Published 25 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27