- István Turai, medical officer (Turaii@who.int)1,
- Katalin Veress, senior lecturer2,
- Bengül Günalp, associate professor3,
- Gennadi Souchkevitch, deputy director4
- 1 Department of Protection of the Human Environment, World Health Organization, Geneva 27, CH-1211, Switzerland
- 2 Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary,
- 3 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gülhane Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey,
- 4 Institute of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Moscow, Russia
- Correspondence to: I Turai
- Accepted 22 December 2003
Events that expose people to radiation are rare, but the threat of radiation injury is increasing. Doctors should know how to recognise and manage suspected exposure or contamination
Introduction
After the attacks of 11 September 2001, use of sources of radiation by terrorists with the potential to cause human damage has become a greater threat.1–4 Various professionals have discussed whether malevolent use of these sources could result in radiation sickness or radiation injuries on a large scale and the possible results.5–7 Radiation sickness is the acute or delayed consequences of exposure of the whole body or a large part to high doses of ionising radiation capable of causing a set of non-specific clinical symptoms and haematological changes. Radiation injury is the acute or delayed consequences of exposure of a small part of the body to high doses of ionising radiation capable of causing burns or other localised organ pathology—for example, cataract, hypothyreosis, and pneumonia.
Responses to recent incidents involving radiation indicate that most general practitioners are uncertain about the health consequences of exposure to ionising radiation and the medical management of exposed patients.8–10
Clinical manifestations of pathological changes depend on the size of the exposed area of the body. The severity of symptoms depends on the absorbed dose of radiation by the exposed area of the body.
The medical community needs to consider this issue because of the need for emergency medical care after a possible use of radionuclear materials by terrorists.11 12
Medical education and postgraduate training programmes for primary care doctors worldwide seem to lack the appropriate information about radiation incidents as regards recognition, differential diagnosis, and first medical response.7 13 14 We aim to advise on the basic medical management of radiation sickness and radiation injuries, and …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: How much of a social media profile can doctors have?
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Diagnosis and management of Raynaud’s phenomenon
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Is it unethical for doctors to encourage healthy adults to donate a kidney to a stranger? No
Published 13 February 2012
Re: Report predicts 20 million AIDS orphans in Africa by 2010
Published 13 February 2012
Re: On the impossibility of being expert
Published 13 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (8 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
How much of a social media profile can doctors have? (7 responses)
Published 23 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012