Editor's Choice Nothingness: the role of journals BMJ 2004; 328 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7438.0-g (Published 26 February 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:0-g Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Editorial What doesn't work and how to show it Published: 26 February 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7438.473 News Seven doctors accused of over-prescribing heroin Published: 26 February 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7438.483 News Pressure mounts for inquiry into MMR furore Published: 26 February 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7438.483-a Review Editor in the eye of a storm Published: 26 February 2004; BMJ 328 doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7438.528 See more Commentary: I see no convincing evidence of “enterocolitis,” “colitis,” or a “unique disease process” BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6985; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6985 Institutional research misconduct BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d7284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7284 Pathology reports solve “new bowel disease” riddle BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6823; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6823 Commentary: We came to an overwhelming and uniform opinion that these reports do not show colitis BMJ November 09, 2011, 343 d6979; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6979 Is research safe in their hands? BMJ January 19, 2011, 342 d284; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d284