Validity of Canadian studies

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7437.465-b (Published 19 February 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:465.3

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

Response of editor of BMJ

  1. Richard Smith, editor
  1. BMJ

    EDITOR—We were wrong to suggest that Chandra's paper showed that participants could remember 50 digits,1 and a correction has been published.2

    In his rapid response to White's news article Chandra quotes Professor Meisen's letter at length,3 but that letter was dated 2 April 2001. In response to that letter I went back to our …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL