Author's reply
- Tom Marshall, clinical lecturer (T.P.Marshall@bham.ac.uk)
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
EDITOR—Correspondents responding to my article on bmj.com raise several interesting issues.1 Nevertheless no correspondent disputes either the approach (incremental cost effectiveness analysis) or the fundamental findings: that aspirin and antihypertensive treatment with bendrofluazide and atenolol are markedly more cost effective than statins and clopidogrel.
Conradi et al and O'Donnell indicate that statins may have more side effects than is generally appreciated. Mann doubts the effectiveness of clopidogrel in primary prevention.1 Both points strengthen the paper's conclusions. I agree …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27