Letters

Quality of randomised controlled trials

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7434.286-a (Published 29 January 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:286

Quality of trial methods is not good in all disciplines

  1. Helen H G Handoll, senior lecturer ([email protected])
  1. School of Health and Social Care, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA

    EDITOR—The paper by Soares et al is a useful reminder of the important distinction between quality of trial reporting and quality of trial methods.1

    An established, motivated, and informed group such as the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group is likely not only to have well designed trials but to conduct them according to …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe