Letters

Editors and their priorities about libel and fraud

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7433.230-b (Published 22 January 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:230

Everyone in science must be active in its process

  1. John H Lange (johnhlange@worldnet.att.net), consultant
  1. Envirosafe Training and Consultants, PO Box 114022, Pittsburgh, PA 15239, USA

    EDITOR—Ferriman discusses whether editors have their priorities right, raising important issues, particularly for associate editors of specialist journals.1 For example, I cannot review papers for the issues raised by Ferriman because there is simply no time. Much of …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe