Letter

Editors and their priorities about libel and fraud

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7433.230 (Published 22 January 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:230.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

We need whistleblowers

  1. John S Garrow (johngarrow@aol.com), chairman, HealthWatch
  1. Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire WD3 7DQ

    E—I have followed the rapid responses to the report of the HealthWatch Award address by Peter Wilmshurst.1 2 Having worked with Wilmshurst (he was my registrar 30 years ago) I can confirm Beard-sell's opinion that he is not just a troublemaker but an unusually honest doctor who has his patients' best interests at heart.2

    Syed says that local research committees should monitor experimental data, and Goodman …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular