Journal

PLOS Biology

BMJ 2004; 328 doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.56-a (Published 1 January 2004)
Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:56.2

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Neil Turner, professor of nephrology (neil.turner@ed.ac.uk)
  1. Renal and Autoimmunity Group, Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Edinburgh, and Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

    An open access online journal from the Public Library of Science; first issue October 2003

    ISSN 1544 9173 http://www.plosbiology.org/

    Rating:Embedded ImageEmbedded ImageEmbedded ImageEmbedded Image

    What an extraordinary time it is in scientific and medical publishing. These pages and many others have documented the increasing tension between traditional publishers and their audience in recent years. The essence of the problem is that readers have become dependent on easy-to-search, universally accessible electronic archives, which are owned by publishers, unlike old printed copies. If institutions stop current subscriptions, they also lose access to old issues. Publishers therefore seem to be free to charge what they like for access—and there is a perception that …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    THIS WEEK'S POLL