- David Pitches, specialist registrar (d.w.pitches@bham.ac.uk)1,
- Amanda Burls, senior clinical lecturer1,
- Anne Fry-Smith, information specialist1
- 1Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT2
- Correspondence to: D Pitches
The introduction of performance league tables for UK surgeons and hospitals has forced them to learn how to present data in the best possible light. Though there is anurgent need for guidance, official guidelines on how to optimise performance data are lacking
Surgeons' and hospitals' positions in league tables can make or break their reputations. They therefore need to learn how to present data in the best possible light. Although some may protest about “sexing up” poor performance data, “creative accounting” adds a positive spin. In contrast to the plethora of clinical guidelines, there is still no official advice on how to optimise performance data, and wide variations in practice persist. This review provides a timely, evidence based response to the urgent need for guidance.
Methods
We searched Medline for empirical examples of creative accounting (using the search terms “gaming”, “mortality“, “league
table$”, “upcoding”, “fraud$”, “quality“, and “quality indicators, health care/”) and identified 284 papers, of which we reviewed the most relevant for suitable examples. We also searched the web with Google using “examples hospital healthcare fiddling figures.” We included anecdotes from personal experience.
Categories of creative accounting
In addition to fraudulent or biased research, which has been thoroughly reviewed elsewhere,1 we identified three broad categories of creative accounting:
Gaming of non-clinical performance data
Fraudulent reimbursement claims
Gaming of clinical data.
Manipulation of non-clinical performance targets
This is particularly important for managers when meeting so called P-45 targets—an expression used by Tony Wright MP while examining Sir Nigel Crisp for the House of Commons Select Committee on Public Administration2 and meaning targets for which failure to meet can result in redundancy (in Britain the P-45 is the tax form people receive when leaving employment). A House of Commons investigation in 2002 uncovered strategies to bring waiting times and numbers of patients waiting for treatment within national targets.3 …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012