- Gary J Macfarlane, professor of epidemiology (G.Macfarlane{at}man.ac.uk)1,
- Anne-Marie Biggs, research associate1,
- Noreen Maconochie, senior lecturer in epidemiology and statistics2,
- Matthew Hotopf, reader in psychological medicine3,
- Patricia Doyle, reader in epidemiology2,
- Mark Lunt, research fellow4
- 1Unit of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT
- 2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London WC1E 7HT
- 3Gulf War Illnesses Research Unit, Department of Psychological Medicine, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London SE5 8AZ
- 4Arthritis Research Campaign Epidemiology Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, University of Manchester
- Correspondence to: G J Macfarlane
- Accepted 7 October 2003
Abstract
Objectives To determine whether incidence rates of cancer are higher in UK service personnel who were deployed in the Gulf war than in those not deployed and whether any increased risk of cancer is related to self reported exposures to potentially hazardous material during the period of deployment.
Design A cohort study with follow up from 1 April 1991 (the end of the Gulf war) to 31 July 2002.
Participants 51 721 Gulf war veterans and 50 755 service personnel matched for age, sex, rank, service, and level of fitness who were not deployed in the Gulf (the Era cohort).
Main outcome measures Incident cancers, identified on the NHS central register.
Results There were 270 incident cancers among the Gulf cohort and 269 among the Era cohort (incidence rate ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.17). There was no excess in site specific cancers among the Gulf cohort. Adjustment for lifestyle factors (smoking and alcohol consumption) did not alter these results. In the Gulf cohort, risk of cancer was not related to multiple vaccinations or exposure to pesticides or depleted uranium during deployment.
Conclusion There is no current excess risk of cancer overall nor of site specific cancers in Gulf war veterans. Specific exposures during deployment have not resulted in a subsequent increased risk of cancer. The long latent period for cancer, however, necessitates the continued follow up of these cohorts.
Footnotes
-
Contributors GJM planned the study, and GJM, NM, PD, and MH were involved in the collection of data in the morbidity surveys. A-MB and ML conducted the data analysis. GJM drafted the manuscript, which was then revised by all authors. GJM, A-MB, and ML are guarantors
-
Funding Ministry of Defence
-
Competing interests None declared
-
Ethical approval University of Manchester Committee on the Ethics of Research on Human Beings
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: The comforts of spiritualism
Published 23 May 2012
Re: The hardest thing: admitting error
Published 23 May 2012
Ice cream headache as a new example of “Cold headache” in Avicenna’s manuscript
Published 23 May 2012
Re: Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial seriesCommentary: Larger trials are needed
Published 23 May 2012
Re: Testing athletes, and banning those who take drugs, is unjustifiable
Published 23 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (6 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32