Editorials

Delayed prescriptions

BMJ 2003; 327 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1361 (Published 11 December 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:1361
  1. Bruce Arroll, associate professor ([email protected]),
  2. Tim Kenealy, doctoral fellow,
  3. Felicity Goodyear-Smith, senior lecturer,
  4. Ngaire Kerse, senior lecturer
  1. Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland PB 92019 Auckland New Zealand

    Can reduce antibiotic use in acute respiratory infections

    Although a reduction has occurred in the use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections, international evidence indicates that they continue to be used for these conditions.1 This is in spite of Cochrane reviews indicating minimal or no benefit from antibiotics for sore throat, acute bronchitis, the common cold, and otitis media. This situation of potentially inappropriate prescribing prompted one commentator to suggest the use of delayed prescriptions (also known as “back-pocket,” “back-up,” or “as needed” prescriptions).2 These are prescriptions written with a proviso that they not be used immediately and only if symptoms do not improve.

    The first randomised trial of delayed prescriptions for respiratory symptoms was undertaken by Little et al (1997), who gave antibiotics, with the prescription to be filled immediately or after three days, or no antibiotics for acute sore throat.3 The immediate group filled 99% of the antibiotic prescriptions whereas …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe