Letter

Paying for bmj.com: Is this measure scientific literature's half open sesame?

BMJ 2003; 327 doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1347-d (Published 4 December 2003)
Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:1347.5

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Clarence C Tam, clinical scientist1 (clarence.tam@lshtm.ac.uk),
  2. Ben A Lopman, clinical scientist2,
  3. Dina Handan, research student3
  1. 1Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9 5EQ
  2. 2Health Protection Agency Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9 5EQ
  3. 3Public and Environmental Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT

    EDITOR—Over the past decade the BMJ has shown its commitment to widening access by providing universally free online content and reduced subscriptions for people in resource limited settings. Given its support for open access, it is regrettable that, in the face of falling paper sales, the journal should opt to …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular