- Zhuochun Wu, associate professor (zcwu{at}shmu.edu.cn)1,
- Kirsi Viisainen, senior researcher2,
- Ying Wang, research assistant1,
- Elina Hemminki, research professor2
- 1School of Public Health, Fudan University, 138 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai 200032, China
- 2 National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, PO Box 220, 00531 Helsinki, Finland
- Correspondence to: Z Wu
- Accepted 30 September 2003
Abstract
Objectives To explore the use of local civil registration data to assess the perinatal mortality in a typical rural county in a less developed province in China, 1999-2000.
Design Retrospective cohort study. Pregnancies in a cohort of women followed from registration of pregnancy to outcome of infant seven days after birth.
Setting Routine family planning records in 20 rural townships in eastern China.
Subjects 3697 pregnancies registered by the local family planning system during 1999.
Main outcome measures Abortions, stillbirths, early neonatal mortality, perinatal mortality.
Results Only three cases were lost to follow up. The average age of the women at pregnancy was 25.9 years. Three hundred and twelve pregnancies were aborted and 240 ended in miscarriage (total 552, 15%). The perinatal mortality rate was 69 per 1000 births, the rate of stillbirth was 24 per 1000 births, and the early neonatal mortality was 46 per 1000 live births. The early neonatal mortality was 29 in boys and 69 in girls per 1000 live births. The perinatal mortality rate increased notably with parity and was higher in townships having lower income per capita.
Conclusions The family planning system at the most local level is a useful data source for studying perinatal mortality in rural China. The perinatal mortality rate in the study county was higher than previously reported for both rural and urban areas in China. The results by parity and sex of the infant raise concern over the impact of the one child policy.
Footnotes
-
Contributors ZW, KV, and EH conceived and implemented the study, conducted the analysis, and wrote the manuscript. YW assisted in data analysis and writing. ZW is guarantor of the paper
-
Funding Academy of Finland
-
Competing interests None declared
-
Ethical approval The study was approved by the STAKES ethics committee, 11 January 1999
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: The comforts of spiritualism
Published 23 May 2012
Re: The hardest thing: admitting error
Published 23 May 2012
Ice cream headache as a new example of “Cold headache” in Avicenna’s manuscript
Published 23 May 2012
Re: Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial seriesCommentary: Larger trials are needed
Published 23 May 2012
Re: Testing athletes, and banning those who take drugs, is unjustifiable
Published 23 May 2012
Most responses
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (8 responses)
Published 2 May 2012
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (6 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32