Editorials

Treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding

BMJ 2003; 327 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1243 (Published 27 November 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:1243
  1. Anne Lethaby (a.lethaby@auckland.ac.nz), editor,
  2. Cindy Farquhar, professor
  1. Cochrane Menstrual Disorders & Fertility Group
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, 2nd Floor, National Women's Hospital, Auckland, 1005 New Zealand

    Guidelines improve prescribing practice but may not affect hysterectomy rates

    Heavy menstrual bleeding is a common cause of iron deficiency anaemia and may affect a woman's quality of life. Thirty per cent of women consider their menstruation to be excessive.w1 In more than half of women with menorrhagia no obvious cause for the bleeding is found, and in at least half of those who undergo hysterectomies in the United Kingdom heavy menstrual bleeding is the main presenting problem.w2 Concern has been expressed that unnecessary surgery is being performed, and treatment of this common condition is not appropriate and evidence based.1

    One difficulty with the available research is that the focus has been on trying accurately to measure blood loss as a response to treatment. There are problems with this approach. Firstly, there is a large discrepancy between women's perception of their menstrual loss and accurate measurement of the blood flow. For example, only about half of women complaining of heavy menstrual bleeding have a menstrual loss greater than 80 ml per cycle, which is the cut-off for a clinical diagnosis of heavy menstrual bleeding.2 Secondly, the current gold standard for measuring menstrual blood loss is a modification of the alkaline haematin technique,3 but this …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe