- Jill Clayton-Smith, consultant clinical geneticist
- Regional Genetic Service, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester M13 0JH
Is increasingly recognised, especially after assisted reproduction
Genomic imprinting, defined as gene expression dependent on the parent of origin,1 has been increasingly recognised over the past decade as a mechanism contributing to human disease. The topic now features as a core part of any genetics curriculum, appears in postgraduate medical examinations, and is a term familiar to many clinicians. Recently abnormalities of genomic imprinting have been discussed in the context of assisted reproductive technologies. So what exactly is genomic imprinting, and how does it occur?
For many years a gene was assumed to have the same function, whether it was inherited from the mother or the father. We now know this is not the case, as the DNA of some genes is modified during gametogenesis and as a result may have altered expression, becoming either inactivated or activated. Genes that are susceptible to parent specific modification in this way (termed epigenetic, because the modification does not entail mutation of the DNA code) are referred to as imprinted genes.2 The mechanism of imprinting is still not entirely clear but in most cases entails the process of methylation, with imprinted genes showing differences in methylation between the …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27