Tobacco money, the BMJ, and guilt by associationBMJ 2003; 327 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjusa.03070001 (Published 19 November 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:E236
- Steven H Woolf, MD, MPH
From BMJ USA 2003;July:344
Bans against smoking in public are ubiquitous. Cigarette smoke is irritating, and passive inhalation increases tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. Or perhaps not, say Enstrom and Kabat (BMJ USA p 369). Based on an analysis of data from the American Cancer Society, they conclude that the association “may be considerably weaker than generally believed.” A firestorm erupted when the BMJ published this article in May. The American Cancer Society released a stinging press statement. The BMJ received 130 Rapid Responses and was advised to issue a retraction. Two main concerns predominated. First, the authors acknowledged being funded by an organization tied to tobacco …
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
Sign up for a free trial