Intended for healthcare professionals

Paper

Family attitudes to research using samples taken at coroner's postmortem examinations: review of records

BMJ 2003; 327 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7418.781 (Published 02 October 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:781
  1. Christopher Womack (chris.womack@pbh-tr.nhs.uk), consultant histopathologist1,
  2. Alison L Jack, senior pathology liaison nurse1
  1. 1 Department of Cellular Pathology, Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough PE3 6DA
  1. Correspondence to: C Womack
  • Accepted 3 July 2003

Introduction

The response of families asked for cadaveric blood and tissue may have been affected by adverse publicity about hospitals retaining tissues and organs removed at post mortem without consent. The tissue bank at Peterborough was asked to contribute control samples to an English Department of Health funded study to validate tests for viral markers in postmortem material. The study required samples of cadaveric blood (10–20 ml), lymph node (one intrathoracic), and liver (2 cm3).1 Peterborough was selected because it does not have a high prevalence of bloodborne viral infections and because the tissue bank had the infrastructure to retrieve postmortem tissue for research.2 Participation in this study enabled us to evaluate the attitudes of families who were asked to allow the pathologist to take samples for research during a postmortem examination being done at the request of the coroner.

View this table:

Reasons for refusal among families asked by coroner's officers to take a …

View Full Text