Letters

Statistical interpretation can also bias research evidence

BMJ 2003; 327 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7417.752-a (Published 25 September 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;327:752
  1. Lorne Basskin,, president (lbasskin@hotmail.com)
  1. Trinka Medical Education and Publications, 11100 Minneapolis Drive, Cooper City, FL 33026, USA

    EDITOR–Kaptchuk discussed the effect of interpretive bias on research evidence.1 Let me add one more example. Studies are designed to determine whether “a statistically significant difference” exists between the outcomes of two alternative treatments. If no difference is discovered the temptation for authors is to conclude that the treatment under investigation is “just …

    View Full Text

    Sign in

    Log in through your institution

    Free trial

    Register for a free trial to thebmj.com to receive unlimited access to all content on thebmj.com for 14 days.
    Sign up for a free trial

    Subscribe