- Steven Woloshin, associate professor of medicine (steven.woloshin@dartmouth.edu),
- Lisa M Schwartz, associate professor of medicine,
- Andrew Ellner, assistant medical editor
- VA Outcomes Group, VA Medical Center, 215 N Main Street, White River Junction, VT 05005, USA
- BMJ Knowledge, London WC1H 9JR
Don't forget the basics
Web based risk calculators are among the newest information resources available to people who want to understand the health risks they face. The advantage of these calculators is their ability to generate tailored risk information based on personal factors. But their usefulness depends on their accuracy and whether they are complete or balanced. To focus on the second issue, we present a hypothetical case history highlighting some elements of good (and not so good) risk communication.
The case: Mr Jones is a 55 year old white man worried about prostate cancer after reading about a politician who had recently been diagnosed with the disease. His first search effort–using the Google search engine to look for “prostate cancer and risk calculator” yields 8410 hits. The first hit (http://www.yourcancerrisk.harvard.edu/) seems perfect. This asks him questions about himself and, based on his age, ethnic group, family history, height, vasectomy history (he had one), and dietary habits (he eats ext-link ≤5 servings of food with animal fat a day and ≤5 servings of tomato based foods a week), tells him his risk is above average. He is now even more worried and calls his doctor.
Mr Jones's doctor explains that three things are missing in this risk assessment: clarity about the risk, context, and an acknowledgment of uncertainty.
Clarity
Clarity means knowing what specific risk is under consideration (is this about getting or dying …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27