- Eike Wrenger, nephrologist (Eike.Wrenger@medizin.unimagdeburg.de)1,
- Regina Müller, internist1,
- Michael Moesenthin, nephrologist1,
- Tobias Welte, intensive care physician2,
- Jürgen C Frölich, professor of clinical pharmacology3,
- Klaus H Neumann, professor of nephrology1
- 1Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Leipziger Strasse 44, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
- 2Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Angiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke-University
- 3Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover, Germany
- Correspondence to: E H Wrenger
- Accepted 17 April 2003
Introduction
The randomised aldactone evaluation study (RALES) proved a substantial (30%) reduction in risk of mortality in patients with severe congestive heart failure by treatment with low dose spironolactone (25-50 mg a day) in addition to standard treatment.1 Exclusion criteria for treatment in the study were a plasma potassium concentration > 5.0 mmol/l and serum creatinine concentration > 221 μmol/l. A pilot study had previously shown that the higher the dosage of spironolactone (up to 24% with 75 mg a day) the higher the risk of hyperkalaemia.2 Standard treatment for patients with heart failure categorised as New York Heart Association class II to IV includes angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists (AT1 receptor blockers).3 Both spironolactone and ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor blockers reduce the renal elimination of potassium.4 In RALES, the increase in potassium was judged not to be important as serious hyperkalaemia (> 6 mmol/l) occurred in only 10 (1%) of 841 patients taking placebo and in 14 (2%) of 822 patients taking spironolactone, with no significant difference between the groups. Discontinuation of the treatment was necessary in only one patient taking placebo and three patients taking spironolactone.1
We present a larger case series of life threatening hyperkalaemia in patients who were receiving spironolactone plus ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor blockers. We identify clinical circumstances associated with this medical emergency and suggest recommendations for prevention.
Case series
From January 1999 until December 2002 we observed 44 patients (17 men) with congestive heart failure who were taking spironolactone and ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor blockers and were admitted to our nephrology unit …
Sign in
Personal subscribers, sign in here:
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
The decline in the breast cancer incidence is 1.2% and it is not significant.
Published 10 February 2012
'twas ever thus
Published 10 February 2012
The value of historic human remains
Published 10 February 2012
In Praise of British Literature
Published 10 February 2012
Is real shared decision making possible?
Published 10 February 2012
Most responses
Does anyone understand the government’s plan for the NHS? (17 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012
Bad medicine: medical nutrition (15 responses)
Published 18 Jan 2012
Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare (7 responses)
Published 27 Jan 2012
Why legislation is necessary for my health reforms (7 responses)
Published 1 Feb 2012
Search for evidence goes on (5 responses)
Published 17 Jan 2012