Menu

 

Education and debate

Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence

BMJ 2003; 326 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1453 (Published 25 June 2003)
Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:1453

Related articles

Research: Effects of acupuncture on rates of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: systematic review and meta-analysis

Published 6 March 2008; BMJ 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39471.430451.BE

Analysis: Listen to the data when results are not significant

Published 3 January 2008; BMJ 336 doi: 10.1136/bmj.39379.359560.AD

Letter: Statistical interpretation can also bias research evidence

Published 25 September 2003; BMJ 327 doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7417.752-a

Data supplement

Further references

Published

See more

News: Americans should lower salt intake but not too much, review says

Published 16 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3215

News: Government welfare cuts are hitting children, says BMA

Published 16 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3129

News: In brief

Published 15 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3096

News: Challenge to research on heart disease patterns in India sparks controversy

Published 15 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3155

Research News: No cardiovascular benefit from fish oil for high risk adults

Published 15 May 2013; BMJ 346 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3086

This article has been cited by other articles:

Latest comments and most commented

THIS WEEK'S POLL

Read related article

See previous polls