- Alex Faulkner, senior research associate (faulknerac@cf.ac.uk),
- Ingrid Geesink, research associate (geesinki@cf.ac.uk),
- Julie Kent, senior lecturer in sociology (julie.kent@uwe.ac.uk),
- David FitzPatrick, lecturer in bio-engineering (david.fitzpatrick@ucd.ie)
- Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, Cardiff CF10 3WT
- University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY
- University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland
The new Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) came into existence in the United Kingdom on 1 April 2003. The new agency is the result of the merger of the Medicines Control Agency and the Medical Devices Agency, which have statutory responsibility for the regulation of medicines and medical devices. The merged body does not have new powers and leaves the existing statutory basis of regulation unchanged. Systems of licensing medicines and the control of medical devices will continue as before, but the merger is seen in the Department of Health as strengthening public protection in the context of “growing numbers of products that cross the borderline between medicines and devices.”1 The regulatory status of borderline technologies is uncertain, and acknowledgement of this is highly important for the control of regenerative medicine.
Industry, academic science and engineering, and governments are promoting tissue engineered technologies. In the United Kingdom several research councils are supporting a national centre for tissue engineering research, and other research centres are mushrooming. As a form of regenerative medicine, human tissue engineered technologies may offer notable benefits to patients in longevity, biocompatibility, and performance of implants. Expectations and hopes are high.2 The technologies combine …
Sign in
Article access
Article access for 1 day
Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*
The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record







CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter
Stumbleupon
Rapid responses
Latest Responses
Re: Ventilator associated pneumonia
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Restless legs syndrome
Published 30 May 2012
Author's reply
Published 30 May 2012
Re: Full access to trial data holds many benefits and a few pitfalls, conference hears
Published 30 May 2012
Restless Legs Syndrome: Fact or Fiction
Published 30 May 2012
Most responses
Venous thrombosis in users of non-oral hormonal contraception: follow-up study, Denmark 2001-10 (12 responses)
Published 10 May 2012 - 23:32
The psychiatric oligarchs who medicalise normality (9 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 15:42
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? No (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
Are doctors justified in taking industrial action in defence of their pensions? Yes (8 responses)
Published 8 May 2012 - 12:21
The hardest thing: admitting error (7 responses)
Published 2 May 2012 - 12:27