Letter

Computerised evidence based guidelines in primary care: Authors' reply

BMJ 2003; 326 doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1088 (Published 15 May 2003)
Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:1088.1

Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment. Please log in or subscribe below.

  1. Martin Eccles (martin.eccles@ncl.ac.uk), professor of clinical effectiveness,
  2. Nikki Rousseau, research associate,
  3. Elaine McColl, national primary care career scientist,
  4. John Newton, principal lecturer,
  5. Jeremy Grimshaw, professor of health services research
  1. Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA
  2. Department of Sociology, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST
  3. Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD

    EDITOR—The enduring message from researching methods to promote the uptake of research findings is that no one strategy that will work for all individuals, settings and behaviours,1 yet this is what both Prince and Lipman imply.

    It is understandable that Prince promotes a locally developed computerised decision support system addressing local needs and priorities, particularly as …

    Access to the full text of this article requires a subscription or payment

    Subscribe

    Article access

    Article access for 1 day

    Purchase this article for £20 $30 €32*

    The PDF version can be downloaded as your personal record

    * Prices do not include VAT

    Rapid responses

    THIS WEEK'S POLL

    Read related article

    See previous polls

    BMJ most popular